Topic > Could anarchy work? - 1125

Here it is, the word “A”; Anarchy. The word that might scare some or the word might make some think that it is just senseless chaos and destruction. In this article I will provide some information about anarchy. Anarchy has multiple definitions in many dictionaries. Anarchy, according to Webster's dictionary definitions, means: A. absence of government. B a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of government authority. C. a utopian society of individuals enjoying complete freedom without government. The opinion of whether anarchy can work or not depends on what a person thinks about it. Is it a state of disorder like the states of definition B? Is this simply a neutral absence of government as definition A says? Or is it a utopian society as definition C states? It is up to each individual to decide based on the information collected. Anarchy comes from the Greek words "an" and "arkhos". “An” means without and “arkhos” means ruler, so combined it means “without rulers.” Anarchy is completely devoid of rulers and authorities, so you can do whatever you want without a higher authority stopping you from doing so. Anarchy has different schools of thought which are fundamentally different categories of anarchy. What are the anarchy schools of thought? From the research I reunited there are many schools of thought and some have subcategories in a certain sense, I will look at the main ones. The schools of thought are: Individualist, Social, Anarcho-Pacifism, Religious, Green, Philosophical and Anarchy without adjectives. Max Stirner, is said to have started Individualistic Individualistic Anarchy: - It has a category: Selfish - Selfishness is the focus on oneself and drives, Max Stirner started it. - Individualistic Anarchy focuses on ... middle of the card ... to end the war completely. - Increased happiness for the individual thanks to freedom. Some disadvantages of anarchy: - Some might abuse freedom. - A fairly fragile government system would be formed - The transition from regular government would be difficult. - Many would oppose anarchy. - Ignorance would scare many. Anarchy for some can be seen as a utopian society, for others an idea would never work. It would all depend on world conditions and if it happened too quickly it would definitely cause unstable chaos. The world itself would most likely have to go through a peaceful period before any possibility of anarchy is possible and the world would have to learn that it is possible to thrive and live happily without the state. It all has to do with the state of the world and whether enough people are open to the idea of ​​living completely free.