just war theory 'A way of morally justifying war by the theory that, despite its evils, war may be necessary and justifiable under certain conditions and within certain limits. The conditions for entering and waging wars are built. It differs from pacifism and the theory of holy war. Traditional just war theory covers three main topics: the cause of war, the conduct of war, and the consequences of war. Or, in school tags: jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. But most of the attention is now paid to the middle term, that is, the conduct of the war. This is where obvious crimes are most easily detected, even if they are only occasionally reported and even more rarely punished. The two main rules of jus in bello concern discrimination between combatants and non-combatants, the latter to be spared as much as possible, and proportionality, so that violence is calibrated to its need to reach the end of the war. Claims to morality here are recognized with difficulty in actual combat and contested when recognized. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Just war theory determines the conditions for judging whether it is simply a matter of fighting and the conditions for how the war should be fought. While it was largely created by Christian scholars, it tends to be used by individuals of both faiths and none. Simple war theory is largely a Christian way of thinking that attempts to accommodate three things: taking human life is not right, states have an obligation to defend their residents and safeguard fairness by ensuring innocent human life and safeguarding meaningful virtues and expectations. ability to use power and brutality. The purpose of just war theory is to provide guidance for the correct path for states to act in circumstances of potential conflict. It applies only to states and not to people (despite the fact that an individual can use the assumption to allow him to choose whether it is ethically appropriate to take part in a specific war). Just war principles have been administered to prevent wars and their disastrous outcome. For example, a just war can only be waged as a last resort. All nonviolent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified only if it is fought with a reasonable possibility of death and the harm suffered for a hopeless cause is not morally justifiable. The ultimate goal of a just war is to restore peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not occurred. The violence used in war must be proportional to the damage suffered. States are prohibited from using unnecessary force to achieve the limited objective of addressing harm. Weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war and every effort must be made to avoid killing them. The death of civilians is justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack against a military target. A war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority. Even just causes cannot be served by actions taken by individuals or groups that do not constitute an authority sanctioned by what society and outsiders to society deem legitimate. Since Howard Zinn argues that two moral judgments can be made about the recent.