Rather this system would implement methods such as real-world problem solving, such as hypothetical problem solving scenarios. For example, in biology class, students would design and conduct a laboratory, report data, and produce a conclusion, based on what they have learned; success on such a test would demonstrate that memorizing information or rudimentary knowledge does not they were the reason for the success. We can also look to people, to real-world tests to see how one's theoretical knowledge will apply to life. These tests would go beyond the occasional word problem in math class, rather they would be problems in life that could be solved with the given interaction. For example, in history class, you would be asked to analyze a current political structure and say why and how it failed compared to another. This lets the teacher know that the student has understood the question, understood the government studied, and that his or her successes are sufficient to answer the question correctly. Not being the point, let's change the tests. Rather, tests change the way we look at intelligence in students, tests and performance on them are only a great indicator of intelligence as it is. But standardized tests do not replicate how someone might be able to react and resolve a situation where the application of