Some spend their fortunes on education, health or festivals, while others do not. However, my marriage was simple, even though my parents and husband are from the middle class. We invited far fewer people than the 51 guests allowed by law. We spent only a fraction of what others spend on their wedding. We did not imitate others. Therefore, the Social Conduct Reform Law should be repealed. Our leaders don't obey and others, who live within their means, don't need to. The law is a legacy of the feudal days of the Panchayat, when you could not build a house higher than the royal palace around it, you could not drive cars better than royalties and you could not spend more on weddings, teejs and other festivals compared to royalties. the family did. It should have been abandoned with the monarchy itself. In a normal free-market democracy, the government doesn't tell people how much they should spend on T-shirts or weddings, what they should wear, what cars they should drive, and where they should send their children to school. Such prescriptions are reminiscent of North Korea's authoritarian government, not its democratic one