Indeed, a joint service may ultimately be the military organization that best maximizes the advantages of joint operations. However, the road to creating “a joint service” is no small feat, a big challenge is the different operational language that refers to operational process jargon that resides in each service. A good example is the rapid development of the SAF's services over the years, which has strengthened each service's close interactions with foreign military partners. The SAF's transformation into a world-class military group has slowly allowed foreign influences on each service's jargon and operational processes. The different operational languages ​​within the three services pose the barrier to closer interoperability between them, as each service shares its operational language with its foreign counterparts more than another. Therefore, it is critical to bridge the gap in operational communication between domains within the Services. Only if a common operating language is formed within the different Services is a joint service possible. At present, bridging the gap in the operating language of different services is not a task that can be accomplished in a day, despite advanced communication technology