Juveniles should be tried as adults: adolescent crimes as adults for committing serious violent crimes? I believe that yes, teenagers who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults. I believe this is appropriate for numerous reasons. It reduces the chances of a juvenile delinquent committing more serious crimes later in his or her life. It also provides a certain level of consistency for the severity of the crime, but at the same time treats teen crimes with the seriousness they deserve. Finally it provides a way to teach responsibility. In the article “Kids Are Kids – Until They Commit Crimes” by Marjorie Lundstrom indicates that the zeal to round up ever smaller and wildly troubled kids and push them through the adult system belies everything about the juvenile system. The kids who commit these serious crimes are different from other kids. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Exploring the Arguments on How Juveniles Should Be Tried as Adults From data released in 2016 by the OJJDP (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention) they reported that known juveniles were involved in approximately 700 homicides in United States. This represents approximately 7% of all known homicide offenders. Between 2003 and 2006 the number of juvenile offenders increased by 32%. After the decline in the 1990s, it previously could have dropped by 31% until 2016. Marjorie Lundstrom talks about how the arrest rate for juvenile homicides dropped by 68% from 1993 to 1999. Now in 2019 the rate has reached its highest level low since 1996. adolescents as adults is the result of these low rates of adolescent crime. The problem is that statistics do not erase the reality of these crimes. As politicians and prosecutors across the country push for a tougher stance against young offenders, nearly every state has moved to make it easier to charge juveniles as adults. Trying and sentencing children as adults for serious crimes is a critical part of the sole purpose of justice. This is one of the reasons why minors should be tried as adults, as it makes minors responsible for their actions instead of excusing them due to their age. In the year 2006 the bodies of Marc and Deborah Richardson along with their eight year old son were discovered in their house. The couple's 12-year-old daughter was missing. The first inclination of the police was to think that a kidnapping had occurred. The reality of this crime scene is that the 12-year-old girl, Jasmine Richardson, killed her parents and brother by stabbing them. Her 23-year-old boyfriend, a self-proclaimed "300-year-old werewolf," aided her in the murders by slitting her parents' throats. Jasmine was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but got out four years early despite being convicted of triple murder. The crazy thing is that there are actually advocates who want to help minimize the culpability of these offenders simply because of their age. I completely understand that it can be difficult to comprehend the idea that such a young child could commit such a heinous crime. But children are children, until they commit crimes. Jasmine Richardson's case is extremely similar to Greg Ousley's killing of her parents. In an article for the New York Times by Scott Anderson, yes.

Topic > Juveniles should be tried as adults: adolescent crimes as adults for committing serious violent crimes? I believe that yes, teenagers who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults. I believe this is appropriate for numerous reasons. It reduces the chances of a juvenile delinquent committing more serious crimes later in his or her life. It also provides a certain level of consistency for the severity of the crime, but at the same time treats teen crimes with the seriousness they deserve. Finally it provides a way to teach responsibility. In the article “Kids Are Kids – Until They Commit Crimes” by Marjorie Lundstrom indicates that the zeal to round up ever smaller and wildly troubled kids and push them through the adult system belies everything about the juvenile system. The kids who commit these serious crimes are different from other kids. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Exploring the Arguments on How Juveniles Should Be Tried as Adults From data released in 2016 by the OJJDP (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention) they reported that known juveniles were involved in approximately 700 homicides in United States. This represents approximately 7% of all known homicide offenders. Between 2003 and 2006 the number of juvenile offenders increased by 32%. After the decline in the 1990s, it previously could have dropped by 31% until 2016. Marjorie Lundstrom talks about how the arrest rate for juvenile homicides dropped by 68% from 1993 to 1999. Now in 2019 the rate has reached its highest level low since 1996. adolescents as adults is the result of these low rates of adolescent crime. The problem is that statistics do not erase the reality of these crimes. As politicians and prosecutors across the country push for a tougher stance against young offenders, nearly every state has moved to make it easier to charge juveniles as adults. Trying and sentencing children as adults for serious crimes is a critical part of the sole purpose of justice. This is one of the reasons why minors should be tried as adults, as it makes minors responsible for their actions instead of excusing them due to their age. In the year 2006 the bodies of Marc and Deborah Richardson along with their eight year old son were discovered in their house. The couple's 12-year-old daughter was missing. The first inclination of the police was to think that a kidnapping had occurred. The reality of this crime scene is that the 12-year-old girl, Jasmine Richardson, killed her parents and brother by stabbing them. Her 23-year-old boyfriend, a self-proclaimed "300-year-old werewolf," aided her in the murders by slitting her parents' throats. Jasmine was sentenced to 10 years in prison, but got out four years early despite being convicted of triple murder. The crazy thing is that there are actually advocates who want to help minimize the culpability of these offenders simply because of their age. I completely understand that it can be difficult to comprehend the idea that such a young child could commit such a heinous crime. But children are children, until they commit crimes. Jasmine Richardson's case is extremely similar to Greg Ousley's killing of her parents. In an article for the New York Times by Scott Anderson, yes.