After reading the title, I can correctly get the idea of ​​the article that the author tries to convey. Since the title talks about the effect of automatic adaptive corrective feedback on L2 English demand, the author has provided sufficient evidence to support the title. For example, in this article the author mentioned some of the effects of automatic adaptive corrective feedback. First, the author states that students' desire to receive corrective feedback can impact their responsiveness and ultimately the usefulness of the latter. Furthermore, the article shows that corrective feedback can impact how students use L2 English questions, particularly if they are provided with the opportunity to produce modified output. However, there are still many effects declared by the author in this article. Additionally, the article had to use appropriate descriptive words for the title. It contains keywords used as part of the original copy and should characterize the idea of ​​the investigation and can help people search for the article or study and include it in the title. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The sources of this article are all reliable, credible and also trustworthy. Why do I say this? This is because the article contains verifiable and verifiable facts. All studies, interviews and research carried out by the author are real and come from some authors who have carried out the same research previously. For example, whenever there is research or study by other authors, the author will clearly indicate the author's name and the title of the article as evidence to support the contents. Furthermore, the author had provided the references at the end of the article. A reliable article includes references so that the reader can confirm the reality and make their own decision. The references provided by the author are articles from government organizations, books and articles in famous journals, renowned university studies and reports. Furthermore, the exam contains actual data rather than cherry-picked letters from disgruntled sources. In this article, the author conducted some experiments on adaptive corrective feedback and at the end of the experiment, this article will provide the result of the experiment to the readers. Research is conducted to find out whether adaptive corrective feedback benefits second language learners. The hypothesis tested by the researcher is that second language learners who are given adaptive feedback are able to develop their language skills compared to learners who are given static corrective feedback. The students were divided into two groups, namely the experimental group and the control group. The number of correctly formulated questions and the students' perceived usefulness of the feedback provided are recorded. Two computer exercises were designed for the tests. The researcher concluded that adaptive feedback is more effective in learning a second language. Based on the case study done by Dmitri Leontjev, the point I agree with is that students receive corrective feedback through dynamic assessment (DA). DA is defined as a stage of mediated learning that provides a better understanding of students' learning abilities compared to unaided performance through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with more capable peers. DA has two main approaches which are the interventionist approach and the interactive approach. The difference between them is the mode of mediation provided during these assessments (Poehner 2008). In the first case, mediation isstandardized and is provided in a predefined order, often in the form of corrective feedback ranging from implicit to explicit. The creation of computerized dynamic tests has yielded several successes in which mediation is provided automatically. Through DA, it is possible to evaluate a large number of students simultaneously, (re)assess students under uniform conditions and generate student performance. DA evaluates students' potential abilities rather than criticizing their abilities and essentially supports students' development by understanding their abilities. Therefore, I agree that dynamic assessment is one way for students to receive corrective feedback. Besides that, the second point I agree with based on this case study is that adaptive feedback is effective feedback in students receiving corrective feedback. This is because students prefer different types of feedback. Adaptive corrective feedback provided to students while they practice a second or foreign language should enable them to self-diagnose their problems and learn something. Adaptive feedback helped students become more aware of their errors and produce more correct responses. Through this feedback, teachers are able to see if the required structure is within their students' Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) or if more teaching is needed. This feedback is engaging feedback because it engages students and teachers. It is also progressive and interactive as it encourages students to think and talk more in class. Therefore, I agree that adaptive feedback helps students receive corrective feedback. On the other hand, the point I disagree with based on this case study is that only corrective feedback plays an important role in students receiving corrective feedback. This is because not only is corrective feedback important for students to receive feedback, but teachers also play an important role in providing feedback. Amrhein and Nassaji (2010) suggest that teachers should change their students' feedback preferences if these preferences are not beneficial to their students' feedback. One way the grading or tutoring system is used in this study, or a similar one, could help teachers discuss performance profiles with their students, so they can see how the students performed. Teachers can help students identify their mistakes so that they do not find it difficult to find their mistakes. Therefore, this can lead to students not repeating their mistakes. Additionally, teachers need to ensure that students are engaged in challenging and reasonable tasks that stimulate their thinking and motivate their efforts to learn. Teachers need to identify students' strengths and weaknesses at individual and group levels so that they can perform well in the classroom. Therefore, I disagree that corrective feedback plays an important role only in case students receive corrective feedback. According to the article, the difficult point we found after further research is that the generalizability of its result may have been affected due to several study limitations. After calculating the overall number of participants, the fact that the pre-test, post-test and questionnaire not completed by all resulted in fewer cases in the analyzes and the results may also have been affected. Furthermore, there are only two exercises and 17 items in total contained in the pre-test and post-test. Finally, due to school hours, it was not possible to carry out..