“Is Google making our society stupid or is it helping us instead?”. In "Is Google Making Us Stupid", the main idea that Nicholas Carr is trying to make is that the Internet is the main source of information and ideas that we as human beings use, he continues and talks about how it affects our abilities as the people focus on a single thing or idea, and he says that humans have difficulty reading while staying focused because of the Internet and the distractions it has. He then goes on and tries to explain how the way information is presented on the Internet and how it has changed the way we act as a society and think as a whole. To do this he uses many different methods and ways of thinking, uses anecdotes and uses his observations to try to persuade the public that the Internet has been harmful to our thinking and learning processes. Overall, I feel that his argument is not effective due to the choice of sources and also the tone of voice used throughout the article. As you read the article, Carr talks about how the Internet has helped but at the same time also explains the negative aspects of the Internet. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayCarr begins his article with a quote from 2001: A Space Odyssey. He talks about the quote and explains it by talking about "how humans rewire the computer." Then compare and talk about how computers have rewired his brain. Before reading this article, I didn't know who he was, so ironically I went to Google and looked up who he was and what he was known for. “Nicholas Carr is an acclaimed writer on technology, business and culture whose books have been translated into over twenty-five languages.” “He is the Richmond Visiting Professor at Williams College. Carr is also a very well known author, his most recent book "The Shallows". Throughout his article, he seems to rely heavily on his fame to convince readers of his point of view and opinions because he uses a lot of his own opinions and points of view quite frequently to prove the point he made. To be completely honest, I can understand why he would do this because he is a well-qualified expert on this topic, but if I didn't know who he was or hadn't looked into who he was before reading this article, a good portion of his article wouldn't have been effective. After expressing his opinions and ideas, he goes on to talk about his friend's experiences with his own views. After telling her friends about their experiences with reading books, she discovered that their friends have difficulty reading an entire book. This way of thinking probably wouldn't work with everyone because anyone can ask this question to their friends, but this way of thinking works for him because he has authority, and I assume his friends are smart if he is friends with them. If it weren't for Carr, his thesis probably wouldn't have been made very well. Overall, he used his ideas and opinions to prove his point. As I continued to read Carr's article, I found that another thing he does in his article is that he uses observations and noticed that in magazines and in different articles editors and writers have added other little pieces and summaries of different parts of the magazines to help the reader understand what the whole story was about and consequently thinks that this is due to the Internet and its distractions. As I read Carr's article, I noticed that his statement included many observations which included reading several articles online and in books and these are the reasons why these-3.