Topic > Analysis of the character of Julius Caesar in the works of William Shakespeare

William Shakespeare's early writings aim to promote a philosophy of history. He asks how kingdoms are built and destroyed. The author approaches theater as a tool that could potentially clarify key events by studying important actors. For example, Julius Caesar highlights the corruption that transforms the great senatorial government of Rome into a totalitarian empire. The title character represents a leader struggling between the forces of moral principles within himself and the political authority of a corrupt government. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Julius Caesar draws from his greatness, his victories but he has conflicts within himself. Caesar shows a caring side towards the common people of Rome, amidst the suspicions of the conspirators. His focus seemed to be on Rome, his wife, the people, and the noble Brutus, his friend. But he struggles with the decision of whether to care for the Roman people or marvel at the glory they have, using it to his advantage. Caesar bathes in this glory and his pride at having such power defeats him. “Your wisdom is consumed in trust.” Julius Caesar ends up allowing this fame to cloud his opinions, his judgment and his morals. This power he held made him dangerous to the Senate. Greed and ambition are flaws he endures because he has a lot of power as he strives to stay true to himself. Julius Caesar's pride influences his ethics; obtains the favor of the Roman people to come to power. He becomes ignorant and eager for glorification. His loyalty to Brutus, his trust in the senators more than himself, made him vulnerable. Rome is crossed by political conflicts. Julius Caesar had gained so much fame through victories that the politicians in his senate detested him. These politicians were not too fond of the common Roman people whom Caesar seemed fond of. Two senators, Cassius and Brutus, primarily wanted to end Caesar's reign and claimed they were ambitious. “Caesar's ambition will be noteworthy / For we will shake him.” But the people saw in Caesar an alternative to governmental corruption within Rome. Even though he seemed to be breaking the law, Brutus' idealistic views and Cassius' jealousy indicated the extremes to end his reign. Rome's senatorial government valued republican political standards. The people were not against Caesar at all, his senators were. For the elite within the Senate, a dictatorship has destroyed their old traditional values; they feared Caesar. This fear leads to political instability. The corrupt government of Rome only made things worse by trying to justify the reasons for killing Caesar and destroying the power they could have used for the glory of Rome. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Julius Caesar is a unique character in the works of William Shakespeare. The struggle between morality and authority asks whether Caesar brought good to Rome or caused the fall of the republic, was heroic or ambitious. His triumphant exploits, despite having totalitarian control over ethnic groups, strengthened the Roman republic and his dictatorial rule converted Rome into an empire. Julius Caesar's reign is not only considered one of the most fascinating, but rather one of the most revolutionary of his time. Works Cited: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Facts about childhood obesity. Center for food research and action. (2022). National school lunch program. Extracted from