Education is the shining guide in our path of success. Education can be described as the process of acquiring understanding, beliefs, values, skills and practices that teach us to be a true human being. Whatever we have learned, whether imposed or volunteered, comes under the purview of education. Education, as we understand it here, is a process that invites truth and possibility, that encourages and allows time for discovery. It is, as John Dewey (1916) says, a social process – “a process of life and not a preparation for future life”. From this perspective, educators try to act with people rather than on them. This argumentative essay argues that education should be free for all as it allows younger generations to have a better quality of life and can improve social development. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay From an ethical standpoint, it seems unfair that people who have less money miss out on more opportunities. Ethically, opportunities should be open to all people. While it may be true that the availability of an opportunity should not guarantee that a person will receive that opportunity, the opportunity should not be ruled out. For example, all people should be able to become qualified to work in air traffic control, and although a blind person is almost not guaranteed such a job position, the opportunity should not be ruled out by default. Free education, especially free higher education, can open up a range of possibilities that some individuals might not otherwise enjoy, and while such opportunities are not guaranteed, they should not be excluded by default, as is the case when some individuals they are incapable of availing free higher education. Free education for all can reduce social problems. We learn morality from education, so we will know what is right and what is wrong. This can reduce social problems because we can think rationally about what is right and wrong. So free education should provide economic purposes. If a student is sincerely seeking higher education and is not looking for a reason to do nothing and fool around for years exploiting other people's tax money through free education, then such a person can enjoy a long educational process. For example, a student achieving a number of qualifications in law will need five to seven years of education, which is also very expensive. If qualification costs were eliminated, such an individual might be able to take up employment on an intermittent basis, extend their qualification period and take longer to obtain those qualifications more smoothly. Instead of having to spend years as a low-income student accumulating debt and perhaps getting involved in social issues, such a student can spend more time qualifying and working while studying so they can enjoy a more comfortable educational experience. Furthermore, free education should be free as it will reduce the unemployment rate and fewer people would benefit from public assistance. Education should be given free to everyone, no matter who you are, what race you are. As it can significantly reduce the poverty rate by providing people with the skills and knowledge needed to qualify for a particular job. For example, it has been shown that having particular skills can actually help someone qualify for a better job, according to McFarlin. For example, a person