BRT can be labeled as a more flexible mass transit than others because it allows other tire-based vehicles in a guided manner to facilitate interconnection and performance improvement (Deng and Nelson 2011) .Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Furthermore, considering the political aspect of mass transit planning, the implementation of BRT can be done as quickly as before the next election cycle, which makes it attractive to them. Nonetheless, the implementation of BRT in developed countries is slower than elsewhere due to the preference of planners and decision makers for metro or rail systems and also due to funding regulations, including extensive public participation processes (Nikitas and Karlsson 2015 ). BRT is associated with a complex set of actors and stakeholders within the social and technical dimensions of the city, which makes it difficult to implement and operate flawlessly. Studies show that neither BRT only has advantages over other public transport modes, nor are the implementation stories of BRT systems always successful (Nikitas and Karlsson 2015). However, BRT can be considered second best to rail alternatives, although it is less permanent than a rail system. Urban planners often question the land development-stimulating ability of BRT based on this argument. The fact that BRT is cheaper to implement than a rail system does not make up for its capital intensity. On the other hand, BRT is much more expensive than any conventional bus system. The financing approval process is often time-consuming, reducing the time window for the actual implementation of the project. The protest comes from car owners because building a dedicated highway means limiting the space for cars on the road. Although, in theory, it is stated that the implementation of BRT can increase the amount of road space for other vehicles. Therefore, the implementation of BRT is entirely limited by institutionalism rather than inherent conceptual problems. Buses with a high level of service (BHLS) in Europe can have a substantial influence if implemented as part of the “co-modality” concept promoted by the EU, for example coordination between public transport fleet operations and systems parking management to promote dedicated armored ducts for BRT (Nikitas and Karlsson 2015). The following table provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of a BRT system based on its different characteristics.